4465 on Chrome 16.0.912.41 beta-m
4239 on 17.0.949.0 canary
2949 on Safari 5.1.1
2600 on Firefox 9.0
wouldn't complete on Internet Explorer 9.0.8112.16421
i7 2600k @ 4.0Ghz
Detailed version information: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0a2) Gecko/20111027 Firefox/9.0a2
^I'm a Mozilla beta tester, so this is their new browser under development.
Ubuntu 11.04 with XFCE (Open Source Radeon driver, non-WebGL support)
Firefox 8 (Development version): 904; HTML5: 4/6
Chrome: 1654; HTML5: 4/6
Windows 8 Developer Preview (Catalyst 11.8, WebGL supported)
Firefox 7: 934; HTML5: 5/6
Chrome 14: 1710; HTML5: 6/6
I guess this is an unfair result for Linux and Windows just because an open source radeonhd driver (as part of xorg) does not support WebGL. Is this true for anyone out there running Linux? I forgot to mention which version of Chrome I am using in (X)Ubuntu 11.04, though.
I'd prefer Firefox rather than Chrome just because Chrome is faster than Firefox.
Looks like my 5446 I posted before is among the top. I'm guessing the machine plays a fairly large role in the numbers?
2244 Firefox 8 (which is what I normally use)
4257 on Chrome 14.
voted other, cuz i got no clue wtf peacekeeper is even XD
Google Chrome v14
2600k 4.4, 4gb Dominator GT, Corsair Force 60gb OS, WD Caviar Black 1tb data, XFX 5870.
1873 with FF 7.0.1 and about 100 other things open at work (including other browsers)...
EDIT: added Chrome 14.0.835.202 at 3438
AMD X4 oc'd to 3.36ghz, 8gb DDR3, WD Black HDDs, ATI 4870x2, 3 x 24" Asus @ 1080p
2600K @ 5Ghz
8GB Dominator GT
2689 with Rockmelt on a laptop.
3428 Chrome 14
jeez. i got 1005 on firefox 7 and i wouldn't exactly call my PC slow...
EDIT: Just did a retest. 2181
1711 with Firefox 7
3117 with Chrome 14
I love Chrome for the engine speed, but the layout and interface has much to be desired.
Even if FireFox is 2x slower in the benchmarks I still use it over Chrome.
With a 2600K @4.4GHz, GTX560TI Asus DCUTII TOP
HTML5 Capabilities 6/6
This result is unlocked. Log in to lock this result!
Log in to save this result!
Detailed version information: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1
I did the same with Chrome beta and got 4723
Firefox (7.0.1) got 2742
my score is 2323 on Chrome 16.0.904.0, 2408 on Opera 11.51 build 1087, 1492 on Firefox 8.0, 1420 on IE 9..0.8.112.16421, using Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, 8gb of ram, an AMD AthalonII X3 @ 3.1ghz CPU, and dual 1GB Nvidia 9500GT cards in SLI Also Chrome was the only one that could run all 6 HTML capabilities test, and IE9 was only able to run 2 out of 6, opera 5 out of 6, and firefox 5 out of 6. So for me Chrome won, even with a lower score then Opera, at it could run all 6 test no problems.
how come some of you guys have v16 does chrome not auto update
The reason some of us have v16 of Chrome, is because we are using Beta/Alpha versions of the browser, which can be found at www.filehippo.com, and you have to check back daily to update as the beta versions do not always have auto update enabled, and I can say some of the past betas have made me want to pull my hair out, with buggy code, and crashing, and/or locking up my system, so be warned.
3997 on Chrome v16...dont now why...i have 2600k,ati6970HD + 16gb ram,
i need to format an try again.
5005 on Chrome 14.0.835.202
139 on IE8. Yes, right, 139.
0/6 HTML5 Capable. Fortunately I have FF4 on my home pc. I love it.
C2D T5500, 1.6 Ghz, 2GB, W7 Enterprise 32.
Opera - 2010
Firefox - 1249
5055 with chrome. 2600k and 6950s
Looks like I've got the highest so far w00t!
4576 points on Chrome 16.0.904.0 dev-m
Intel i5 2500k system.
Chrome v16 eh... I should try it out and see if it's faster than v15 which I'm using.
Version 16 is faster for sure, even on my crappy VIA C7 1.6ghz 1gb of ram 10.1in netbook running Windows XP pro 32bit, and it seems to use a bit less system resources as well.
3843 on Chrome 14.0.835.202 m
c2d e8400 @ 3.96GHz
Copyright 2013 © Godem Online Inc. | Web and server solutions by NewTech Solutions.