What's your Peacekeeper score?

What's your Peacekeeper score?
 

 
 
 
 

Comments


Anonymous

4465 on Chrome 16.0.912.41 beta-m

4239 on 17.0.949.0 canary

2949 on Safari 5.1.1

2600 on Firefox 9.0

wouldn't complete on Internet Explorer 9.0.8112.16421

i7 2600k @ 4.0Ghz

Anonymous

Detailed version information: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0a2) Gecko/20111027 Firefox/9.0a2

^I'm a Mozilla beta tester, so this is their new browser under development.

GraysonPeddie
GraysonPeddie's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/29/2006
Posts: 569

Ubuntu 11.04 with XFCE (Open Source Radeon driver, non-WebGL support)

Firefox 8 (Development version): 904; HTML5: 4/6
Chrome: 1654; HTML5: 4/6

Windows 8 Developer Preview (Catalyst 11.8, WebGL supported)

Firefox 7: 934; HTML5: 5/6
Chrome 14: 1710; HTML5: 6/6

I guess this is an unfair result for Linux and Windows just because an open source radeonhd driver (as part of xorg) does not support WebGL. Is this true for anyone out there running Linux? I forgot to mention which version of Chrome I am using in (X)Ubuntu 11.04, though.

I'd prefer Firefox rather than Chrome just because Chrome is faster than Firefox.

HTPC: AMD Athlon X2 4050e CPU with 780G ATX motherboard running Windows 8 DP (4GB) and Ubuntu; Server: AMD AII X2 240e CPU with 880G-based ATX motherboard running Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS (8GB)

2 pairs of Insignia NS-B2111s (front/rear), Pioneer SP-C21 Center Speaker, and 12" Velodyne Sub

Just ordered HP Pavilion dv7-6165us from QVC. Will have it by next Friday.

marco871
Offline
Joined: 12/16/2010
Posts: 3

Prophet4NO1
Offline
Joined: 09/13/2010
Posts: 196

Looks like my 5446 I posted before is among the top. I'm guessing the machine plays a fairly large role in the numbers?

Anonymous

2244 Firefox 8 (which is what I normally use)
4257 on Chrome 14.

talisa
talisa's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/08/2011
Posts: 12

voted other, cuz i got no clue wtf peacekeeper is even XD

windows 7 home premium 64bit SP1 * intel core i7-950 @ 3.2ghz * MSI GTX580 Twin Frozr II OC 1.5GB * crucial M4 128GB SSD & Samsung 1TB HDD * 12GB DDR3 RAM 1333mhz * dual monitors HP 2510i 25" & LG M198WA 19" * HAF922 case *

Anonymous
Anonymous

5301
Google Chrome v14
HTML5 6/6
2600k 4.4, 4gb Dominator GT, Corsair Force 60gb OS, WD Caviar Black 1tb data, XFX 5870.

Administrator
Administrator's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/04/2009
Posts: 221

1873 with FF 7.0.1 and about 100 other things open at work (including other browsers)...
EDIT: added Chrome 14.0.835.202 at 3438

AMD X4 oc'd to 3.36ghz, 8gb DDR3, WD Black HDDs, ATI 4870x2, 3 x 24" Asus @ 1080p

Prophet4NO1
Offline
Joined: 09/13/2010
Posts: 196

2600K @ 5Ghz
8GB Dominator GT
570x2 SLI
Chrome

Anonymous

2689 with Rockmelt on a laptop.

Anonymous
Anonymous

3428 Chrome 14

d3uS2029
d3uS2029's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/20/2003
Posts: 291

jeez. i got 1005 on firefox 7 and i wouldn't exactly call my PC slow...

EDIT: Just did a retest. 2181

:.: Intel i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz :.: 12GB Corsair XMS3 @ 1704Mhz :.: ASUS P6T V2 Deluxe :.: ASUS 5870EAH :.: 120GB Vertex 2 (OS) :.: 120GB OCZ Agility (Games) :.: 2x WD Black 2TB (Data) :.: Zalman 850w PSU :.: Lite-On Blu-Ray Burner :.: HP w2207h LCD :.:

Tivon
Tivon's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/26/2002
Posts: 1888

1711 with Firefox 7
3117 with Chrome 14

I love Chrome for the engine speed, but the layout and interface has much to be desired.
Even if FireFox is 2x slower in the benchmarks I still use it over Chrome.

° º ¤ ø . ¸ . ø ¤ º ° º ¤ ø . ¸ ¸ . ø ¤ º ° º ¤ ø . ¸ . ø ¤ º ° º ¤ ø . ¸

Don't test my skills, I was trained by myself! Check out my Gaming Videos!

Anonymous

With a 2600K @4.4GHz, GTX560TI Asus DCUTII TOP

5235
HTML5 Capabilities 6/6
This result is unlocked. Log in to lock this result!
Log in to save this result!
Detailed version information: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1

I did the same with Chrome beta and got 4723

Firefox (7.0.1) got 2742

CommodoreDelights64
CommodoreDelights64's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/15/2010
Posts: 31

my score is 2323 on Chrome 16.0.904.0, 2408 on Opera 11.51 build 1087, 1492 on Firefox 8.0, 1420 on IE 9..0.8.112.16421, using Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, 8gb of ram, an AMD AthalonII X3 @ 3.1ghz CPU, and dual 1GB Nvidia 9500GT cards in SLI Also Chrome was the only one that could run all 6 HTML capabilities test, and IE9 was only able to run 2 out of 6, opera 5 out of 6, and firefox 5 out of 6. So for me Chrome won, even with a lower score then Opera, at it could run all 6 test no problems.

Premchand
Premchand's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/17/2011
Posts: 94

how come some of you guys have v16 does chrome not auto update

CommodoreDelights64
CommodoreDelights64's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/15/2010
Posts: 31

The reason some of us have v16 of Chrome, is because we are using Beta/Alpha versions of the browser, which can be found at www.filehippo.com, and you have to check back daily to update as the beta versions do not always have auto update enabled, and I can say some of the past betas have made me want to pull my hair out, with buggy code, and crashing, and/or locking up my system, so be warned.

MrAdrianPetcu
Offline
Joined: 05/05/2011
Posts: 9

3997 on Chrome v16...dont now why...i have 2600k,ati6970HD + 16gb ram,

i need to format an try again.

Anonymous

5005 on Chrome 14.0.835.202

Anonymous

139 on IE8. Yes, right, 139.
0/6 HTML5 Capable. Fortunately I have FF4 on my home pc. I love it.

C2D T5500, 1.6 Ghz, 2GB, W7 Enterprise 32.

DeV
DeV's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/03/2010
Posts: 25

Opera - 2010
Firefox - 1249

Boov
Offline
Joined: 10/04/2010
Posts: 5

5055 with chrome. 2600k and 6950s
Looks like I've got the highest so far w00t!

Birac
Offline
Joined: 06/12/2011
Posts: 34

4576 points on Chrome 16.0.904.0 dev-m

Intel i5 2500k system.

3dGameMan
3dGameMan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2000
Posts: 5067

Chrome v16 eh... I should try it out and see if it's faster than v15 which I'm using.

Rodney Reynolds,
Register: http://www.3dgameman.com/user/register

CommodoreDelights64
CommodoreDelights64's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/15/2010
Posts: 31

Version 16 is faster for sure, even on my crappy VIA C7 1.6ghz 1gb of ram 10.1in netbook running Windows XP pro 32bit, and it seems to use a bit less system resources as well.

Insan3Lik3
Offline
Joined: 09/08/2011
Posts: 2

3843 on Chrome 14.0.835.202 m

c2d e8400 @ 3.96GHz