Why CPUs Aren't Getting Any Faster

Tagged: amd, cpu, intel, Processor, Computer Hardware
Source: technologyreview.com - Read the full article
Posted: 6 years 1 week ago

"In fact, the next-generation of CPUs, including Intel's forthcoming Sandy Bridge processor, have to contend with multiple walls--a memory bottleneck (the bandwidth of the channel between the CPU and a computer's memory); the instruction level parallelism (ILP) wall (the availability of enough discrete parallel instructions for a multi-core chip) and the power wall (the chip's overall temperature and power consumption)..." | more



Joined: 04/05/2010
Posts: 236

Tiv wrote:Lots of bottlenecks to get past. I guess this is why we are seeing a clear need for new video cards rather than a new processor with DX11.
i'm sorry to say it intel sandybridge will be dx10.1
amds fusion-chips phenom(or for the smal netbooks bobcat x2)+hd5700 or 6xxx will have dx11
amd will come whit bulldozer whit modular design so Block hyper treating this will lower power consumption but only 1 tread each core. so intel wil come whit cpu+gpu and no real arch change while amd comes whit cpu+gpu and new 2 new cpu architectures. maybe intel has something heavy to come but i do not know only looked up for amd. some say that sandybridge will not be good in overclocking because there is no separated multiplier (i searched a lot of this because i wanted to be sure to get an socket that will exist long )and amd does the shrink to 32nm soi

falmatrix2r's picture
Joined: 09/26/2010
Posts: 574

bottlenecks indeed...get ready to rethink the PC and totally change your rig in the next years to come lol

I have a gaming PC and all gaming consoles and it definately doens't get you laid!
My youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/falmatrix2r
TS3 server: ts3.ojoc.org:51432

GraysonPeddie's picture
Joined: 10/29/2006
Posts: 570

So do you think that AMD should focus more in decreased power consumption and less heat while still keeping the same performance? It'd be nice to see AMD Athlon II X4 620e drop the vcore down to 0.5 volts during the next couple of months, which is nice if I'm using an AMD processor for my home server that runs Ubuntu Server as a host and Windows Web Server 2008 as a guest. I know this is impossible to make the vcore go down very low, but is it possible in the future? I'd probably wait until AMD releases a new version of the processor with 32nm manufacturing tech.

PC: Tt Core V21; Kaveri APU, 16GB RAM, GTX 960, Arch Linux
Server: Rosewill Legacy V6-S, AMD Athlon 5350 APU, 8GB RAM, 90W DC-IN PSU, Ubuntu Server

Tiv's picture
Joined: 08/12/2009
Posts: 3584

Lots of bottlenecks to get past. I guess this is why we are seeing a clear need for new video cards rather than a new processor with DX11.

I sleep fine at night knowing we are banning people who deserve it.  Tivon
Don't test my skills, I was trained by myself! Check out my Gaming Videos!