Tagged: Activision, PC Games, Computer Hardware, Gaming
Source: thegamersblog.com - Read the full article
Posted: 2 years 46 weeks ago
We live in a world where we have multiple platforms for gaming. PC, PS3, 360, WII, etc. Each platform has varying amounts of power when it comes to playing games. Games are released across several platforms and the platforms that have the weakest specs or the worst controls tend to get the watered down, crappier versions of the games released.
Activision, one of the leading cross platform publishers, wishes to move away from the “walled gardens” set by Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo.
The president of Activison, Bobby Kotick, believes that the majority of people paying to use XBL are paying to play Modern Warfare 2 — –Activision does not get a share of that profit.
“We’ve heard that 60 per cent of [Microsoft’s] subscribers are principally on Live because of Call of Duty,” Kotick told FT. “We don’t really participate financially in that income stream. We would really like to be able to provide much more value to those millions of players playing on Live, but it’s not our network.”
While one might feel bad that activision isn’t getting in on it’s “share” of the profits one does have to realize that it releases $15 dollar mappacks that it sells millions of. Having said this it isn’t like Activision is hurting for money.
Kotick’s solution is to turn to the PC, where it can set its own model for pricing – not unlike what Blizzard has done with World of Warcraft and Battle.net. Kotick stated that Activision would “very aggressively” support the likes of HP and Dell in any attempt of making an easy ‘plug-and-play’ PC that would hook up directly to the TV.
While I would love to see gaming return to the PC as a primary gaming platform one does have to realize that their are some games that just play better on console based systems such as side scrollers, sports games, and party games. It’s very hard to use the PC as a party platform because a single unit does not provide play access to 4 or more people simultaneously. If this issue could be addressed then it would make the PC more viable as a mass appeal platform. I hate playing games on anything other then a PC, especially shooters. One does have to realize, however, that some games just play better on consoles.
Consoles do provide other elements to developers that make it easier and cheaper to produce games. Games made for consoles have the exact same requirements across the board for everyone playing so you only have to test the game on one system instead of 300 million different combinations. Consoles also have the ease of play factor that you don’t get currently with PC games and thats just putting the CD in and playing. Generally with PC’s you have to install the game before you can play it and for those less knowledgeable this can be a real pain.
Copyright 2013 © Godem Online Inc. | Web and server solutions by NewTech Solutions.
Comments
"It’s very hard to use the PC as a party platform because a single unit does not provide play access to 4 or more people simultaneously."
I can't think of any reason why a PC game couldn't support multiple players on the same unit.
ok im just going to say one thing thank you Activision ive been waiting to find out when some big company would finally admit that its better when its on PC ya consoles are fun for one type of games racing that's it well at least that i know of. i have not found one game that is on consoles and PC and is more fun on consles unless its racing cause keyboards are not presser sensitive like the trigger buttons on xbox or the analog sticks but yes thank you Activision
I do like to use controllers for every game that I like to play, whether it be FPS, Eastern RPG/jRPG, action-RPG, or space combat.
However, it'd be nice to turn off a high-end video card (such as AMD Radeon HD 5870) when I'm not using it, since I already have a 780G motherboard with AMD Radeon HD 3200.
I'd like to make my own 3D Eastern RPG game with Microsoft XNA Game Studio Express with great graphics but are not very taxing in any recent GPU (such as AMD Radeon HD 3200), but I don't seem to put a lot of time into doing that (like building my own world) and I don't want to find an artist to pay for designing 3D models. I do realize that I need to make a story first before I make my own game, which I'm not good at. Alas, it's not really my place to discuss about that since it's about Activision who wants to only focus in making games for the PC.
HTPC: AMD Athlon X2 4050e CPU with 780G ATX motherboard running Windows 8 DP (4GB) and Ubuntu; Server: AMD AII X2 240e CPU with 880G-based ATX motherboard running Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS (8GB)
2 pairs of Insignia NS-B2111s (front/rear), Pioneer SP-C21 Center Speaker, and 12" Velodyne Sub
Just ordered HP Pavilion dv7-6165us from QVC. Will have it by next Friday.
they say it is hard to install mm let me see put the cd in the pc say run the auto run win7 and vista) klikc i agrea yes next next next wait restart or just play the game console put the cd in it say yes i agrea mmm i think it is jsut the same and i only have a ps 3 because it can read some dvds that are copirate protected and it has blouray and flying games work beter with console controller but i can also use the ps3 controller ont he pc and there are pc controllers so i don't see the advantage of the console over the pc i only hope activision will make the graphics optimal for the pc and the gameplay and than port it in the consoles so it is a pc port for the consoles and not a console port
The best thing is to have both pc and console. I have a great gaming pc and a Xbox 360.
On the console i play only Fifa and stuff like that, some arcade games which are more playable with the controller and the rest of the games i play on the Pc.
"All men are evil and will act upon their vicious nature, if given the chance."
Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527)