seagate barracuda or WD black ???

19 replies [Last post]
iAmine
Offline
Joined: 09/26/2012
Posts: 11

which one should i choose ???

Razear
Razear's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 1116

I perfer the WD Blacks but I have the Barracuda as well and they are both great drives.

spawnkiller
spawnkiller's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/06/2012
Posts: 310

Black are 5 years warranty but comes at a greater price than the seagate... Both perform well and i don't think you'll have problem with either one of them...

Gaming PC: MSI Z77A-G45 ::: Intel Core I7 3770k @ 4.83Ghz ::: EVGA GTX680SC Signature ~1300mhz Boost/7122mhz ram ::: 16GB 4*4gb G.Skill 2240mhz CL10 ::: ASUS Xonar DX ::: Crucial M4 128gb (windows) + Intel 330 180gb (Steam games) + 1TB Caviar Black (storage) ::: Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold M1000 ::: Antec P280 ::: Noctua NHU12P SE2 ::: ASUS VE247H ::: Logitech G510 ::: Cooler Master Storm Sentinel II ::: Logitech X530 ::: Steelseries Siberia V-2 Black & gold edition

98% Of people under 25 surround their minds with rap music, if you're part of the 2% that stayed with rock, put this in your signature, ROCK IS BETTER!

iAmine
Offline
Joined: 09/26/2012
Posts: 11

thnx again

3dGameMan
3dGameMan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2000
Posts: 5061

Rodney Reynolds,
Register: http://www.3dgameman.com/user/register

iAmine
Offline
Joined: 09/26/2012
Posts: 11

thnx

3dGameMan
3dGameMan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2000
Posts: 5061

Not though that there are newer Seagate drive then the 7200.11.. But my preference is still with WD.

MikeIllusion
Offline
Joined: 10/08/2012
Posts: 10

My workplace had a rather bad batch of Seagate Barracuda's recently, so I'm with the Man on this one. WD.

Trak
Trak's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/27/2012
Posts: 15

Of all the Hdd's that I've had....Western Digital is by far the most reliable......never had one fail!!

kbeam418
kbeam418's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/15/2011
Posts: 64

I have Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm which is now 5 years old, no bad sectors. I have a Seagate from 2004 still works (never did dskchck). I say both companies are reliable you just can't beat beat them.

98% Of people under 25 surround their minds with rap music, if you're part of the 2% that stayed with rock, put this in your signature, ROCK IS BETTER!

spawnkiller
spawnkiller's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/06/2012
Posts: 310

PS: kbeam418, nice signature, put that in mine too !!!

kbeam418
kbeam418's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/15/2011
Posts: 64

spawnkiller wrote:PS: kbeam418, nice signature, put that in mine too !!!
Thanks. I saw it on another forum lol.

Tivon
Tivon's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/26/2002
Posts: 1877

WD Black would be the best of the two options for sure. Might I add that if you are building a new system get a SSD for the OS and your favorite programs.

° º ¤ ø . ¸ . ø ¤ º ° º ¤ ø . ¸ ¸ . ø ¤ º ° º ¤ ø . ¸ . ø ¤ º ° º ¤ ø . ¸

Don't test my skills, I was trained by myself! Check out my Gaming Videos!

limeDk
limeDk's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/22/2011
Posts: 124

yeah you can never go worng with WD

Malevolence2012
Offline
Joined: 09/28/2012
Posts: 10

I prefer Western Digital... I think they should make 4TB Caviar Blacks already, its been so long.

kbeam418
kbeam418's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/15/2011
Posts: 64

Malevolence2012 wrote:I prefer Western Digital... I think they should make 4TB Caviar Blacks already, its been so long.
Correct me if I'm wrong but don't you need a raid controller for anything bigger than 3TB?

TeeBlack
TeeBlack's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/15/2012
Posts: 111

i would go with WD Black

You dont know me but that's the way i like it!

eire1274
eire1274's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/12/2003
Posts: 1154

limeDk wrote: yeah you can never go worng with WD

God, I wish that were true.

However, WD seems to be producing a better quality than Seagate recently. I imagine they have recovered more quickly than some of their competitors following the flooding in Taiwan, which destroyed many HD producer's equipment.

I still stand by Hitachi as being a very robust drive, even now. They are now building under WD's new HGST brand. HGST actually means "Hitachi Global Storage Technologies". They may not top the speed charts, but are more intended for workstations and file storage, they run a bit cooler than WD's black line, and just seem rock solid. However WD isn't giving quite the same warranty support, with these guys sitting at 3 years.

Nick McDermott

SkullAbyss
Offline
Joined: 10/09/2011
Posts: 22

I would vow for WD or Samsung. The Samsung Spinpoint drives are pretty good with reliability and speed. Same with the WD Blue Series. For energy savings, WD Green Drives

Dan0myte
Dan0myte's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2001
Posts: 317

I know it's been said many times already, but the WD Black is the way to go. Seagates are built for stability and longevity and are great long term storage drives.

Dan's Server Rack:
Norco RPC-470 -> E8500 @ 3.85GHz, GA-EP45-UD3P, 4Gb OCZ 1066 DDR2, OCZ Vertex 60Gb SSD, Seagate 7200.11 320Gb, Zalman 600W Heatpipe PSU, Vista x64 Pro
Norco RPC-270 -> AMD64 3200+, ASRock K8Upgrade-VM800, 1Gb DDR400, WD 80Gb (O/S), WD 1TB Green (Media), parallel 1000Mbs network cards, WinXP Pro